We use an overdispersed binomial model for the count
of votes for
Buchanan out of
ballots cast in county
,
. For each
county there are
observed regressors (including a constant) collected in a
vector
. Following McCullagh and Nelder (1989, 125, eqn. 4.20), the mean and
variance of
are
To estimate
we use a least quartile difference (LQD)
estimator (Croux et al., 1994; Rousseeuw and Croux, 1993) for the scale
. Let
denote the estimated scale
value. Given
, we use a hyperbolic tangent (
)
estimator (Hampel et al., 1981) for
. Let
denote the estimated coefficient vector. The estimators are described in more
detail in the Appendix. An important product of the estimation is a weight
for each county. If
then data from county
had no
effect on
, given
: the
estimator
completely rejected the county as an outlier.
Given expected proportions
,
we use studentized residuals (Carroll and Ruppert, 1988, 31-34) to measure the
discrepancy between actual and expected votes for Buchanan. The studentized
residuals may be compared across counties, both within and across
states.12 A standardized residual is